[In The Beginnings of Architecture] Giedion cites the evidence several times that there is no architectural enclosing of space before script. Giedion does not know why this should be. Visual space alone of all the space discriminated by our various senses is continuous, uniform and connected. Any technology that extends the visual power imposes these visual properties upon all other spaces. Our own return in the electric age to a nonvisual world has confronted us suddenly with this tyrannical and usurping power of the visual over the other senses.
Letter to Jaqueline Tyrwhitt, May 11, 1964, in Letters of Marshall McLuhan (1987), p 298-299
When enclosed, or translated into visual space, architecture tends to lose its tactile kinetic pressure. A square is the enclosure of a visual space; that is, it consists of space properties abstracted from manifest tensions. A triangle follows lines of force, this being the most economical way of anchoring a vertical object. A square moves beyond such kinetic pressures to enclose visual space relations, while depending upon diagonal anchors. This separation of the visual from direct tactile and kinetic pressure, and its translation into new dwelling spaces, occurs only when men have learned to practice specialization of their senses, and fragmentation of their work skills. The square room or house speaks the language of the sedentary specialist, while the round hut or igloo, like the conical wigwam, tells of the integral nomadic ways of food-gathering communities.
Understanding Media, MIT/Routledge edition, (1964), p 125
Less familiar is the architectural revolution made possible by improvements in heating centuries ago. With the mining of coal on a large scale in the Renaissance, inhabitants in the colder climates discovered great new resources of personal energy. New means of heating permitted the manufacture of glass and the enlargement of living quarters and the raising of ceilings. The Burgher house of the Renaissance became at once bedroom, kitchen, workshop, and sale outlet.
Understanding Media, MIT/Routledge edition, (1964), p 186
The ancient city, however, could appear as quickly as specialist man could separate his inner functions in space and architecture. To say that the cities of the Aztecs and the Peruvians resembled European cities is only to say that they shared and extended the same faculties in both regions. The question of direct physical influence and imitation as if by diffusion becomes irrelevant.
Understanding Media, MIT/Routledge edition, (1964), p 186-187
If we sit and talk in a dark room, words suddenly acquire new meanings and different textures. They become richer, even, than architecture, which Le Corbusier rightly says can best be felt at night. All those gestural qualities that the printed page strips from language come back in the dark, and on the radio.
Understanding Media (1964), MIT/Routledge edition, p 303
MCLUHAN: β¦the high-rise is a new form of communication
AUDIENCE MEMBER: βitβs a lot of (inaudible) isnβt itβ
MCLUHAN: If itβs on the side of a mountain it looks nice. If itβs on a flat street it looks horrible
AUDIENCE MEMBER: If it blocks out individual homes (audio hard to determine)
MCLUHAN: Otherwise, itβs just a cemetery. They have high-rise cemeteries now. This is what theyβre really intended for. You buy yourself a little box, in the sky, instead of taking up space on the ground. Literally, the new high-rises are all cemeteries.
Undated Monday Night Seminar, available on YouTube as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXl98nvFuGY&t=11s -- Β time stamp 1:09-1:40.
Eskimos donβt live in igloos, they live in stone houses on the seashore, somewhat round in shape. The igloo is a product of the white manβs visitations. When the white man showed them the Primus stove, they added that to the snow house and it became possible to live there. Or if they didnβt live there, they used it for their trapping lines.
The Museum as Large-Room Pinball Machine, Marshall McLuhan, Harley Parker, and Museum Professionals, 1967, full transcript of a seminar at the City Museum of New York, October 9-10, 1967, edited by William Buxton, published by U. of Alberta Press, 2026, p 103
This reminded me of Sigfried Giedion, whose work I have followed since 1939. He was in St. Louis then, giving the lectures that were published as Space, Time and Architecture. I became acquainted with him and have known him ever since. β¦ Giedionβs whole approach to art and technology is environmental. He called the environment non-museum history, because people are always unaware of it. Now the study of environments as a new perception and new teleology is his theme; so the secret of Giedion is indispensable in the context of here and now. His whole approach to the study of changing styles in art and architecture is something I have taken for granted since β39, when I first met him. It was all new to me then. β¦ So perhaps I have taken too much for granted. This Giedion approach (like Hallβs educational approach, which we mentioned earlier, to the hidden dimensions of experience) is one which seems to me indicated for our time.
The Museum as Large-Room Pinball Machine, Marshall McLuhan, Harley Parker, and Museum Professionals, 1967, full transcript of a seminar at the City Museum of New York, October 9-10, 1967, edited by William Buxton, published by U. of Alberta Press, 2026, p 161