It turns out then, that my communication theory is Thomistic to the core. It has the further advantage of being able to explain Aquinas and Aristotle in modern terms. We are the content of anything we use, if only because these things are extensions of ourselves. The meaning of the pencil, or the chair I use is the interplay between me and these things. Again, the message of these things is the sum of the changes that result from their social use. Thus, I have added two features to "the medium is the message", namely the content and the meaning. Perhaps Pierre Juneau or somebody at C.R.T.C. would like to have this essay apropos the problem of "Canadian content"? The consequence for the discussion of the problem of Canadian content for the media is drastically simplified by noticing that the user is the content. If Canadians use or watch American programs or drive American cars, it is the Canadians who are the content of these things. The meaning is in the resulting interplay or dialogue between Canadians and these things, but there can be no question that the Canadian user of American things is the content of these things. The meaning and the message are something else. It is unfortunate that the C.R.T.C. ever involved itself in the question of content, especially since it does not understand the nature of media at all, except as hardware. β¦Since the user as content is not a figure of speech but a basic dynamic and cognitative relationship, I think you will find that it can be pushed all the way as a means of orientation in media, economics and politics. I suggest that it can be the basis for a complete restatement of political and economic realities in the information age of the wired planet.
Letter to J.M Davey, Office of the Prime Minister, March 2, 1971, in Letters of Marshall McLuhan (1987) pp 427-428
The βauthorityβ of Aristotle was no greater for a medieval dialectician than the integrity of his principles and the comprehension of his conclusions. Artistotle could, therefore, be cited by various disputants on different sides of the same questions. The βauthorityβ of Cicero was dependent on his moral integrity and the prestige of his eloquenceβ¦
Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time (1943 - doctoral dissertation), typescript, p 289
Ancient grammar was at odds with the dialectics of Plato and, especially, of Aristotle, as the art of interpreting phenomena.
The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time, 1943, published by Gingko in 2006, p 41
A history of dialectics by a dialectician does not exist, apart from the brief remarks of Aristotle.
The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time, 1943, published by Gingko in 2006, p 43
Aristotle, rather than Plato, raised dialectics to the status of an art.
The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time, 1943, published by Gingko in 2006, p 47
Rhetoric, placed under dialectics by Aristotle...
The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time, 1943, published by Gingko in 2006, p 119
The rise of Aristotle and dialectics to supremacy among the arts was especially disastrous to grammar and the classics...
The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time, 1943, published by Gingko in 2006, p 138
...[Petrarchβs] dread of that Averroism, rooted in the Arabic Aristotle, which drew so many into atheism during and after the thirteenth century.
The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of His Time, 1943, published by Gingko in 2006, p 158, n 63
When Coleridge said that all men are born either Platonists or Aristotelians, he was saying that all men tend to be either acoustic or visual in their sensory bias.
Laws of Media: The New Science with Eric McLuhan, (1988), p 113
You know the Aristotelian doctrine of knowing is making. Well, plain knowing has now become the only meaningful source of wealth.
Letter to Mother St. Micheal [Winnifred]Guinan, June 7, (1965)
Even Aristotle was led into the βusuryβ trap by his failure to see the enormous service environments created by writing and coinage as wealth-makers. From Adam Smith and Ricardo to Karl Marx and Keynes, economists have ignored all service/disservice environments. This blank in their vision has rendered their analyses sterile and irrelevant. Yet by supplying the needed insights to complete this blank, Innis became unintelligible. That is to say, he was stating actualities, which most scholars preferred to know nothing about.
βLibraries, Past, Present, Futureβ (1970), p 8
It was Aristotle who pointed out, way back in that period when they were just discovering visual space and values, that any form, any kind of organized form, when pushed to its limits, instantly assumes the opposite characteristics. We have seen this happen in our own time. Culture has become our business. Ours used to be a business civilization with a little culture added. Now, in the age when the knowledge industries have become overwhelmingly dominant, culture has become the primary mark of our age.
The Museum as Large-Room Pinball Machine, Marshall McLuhan, Harley Parker, and Museum Professionals, 1967, full transcript of a seminar at the City Museum of New York, October, 1967, edited by William Buxton, published by U. of Alberta Press, 2026, p 81